The Latin American Model in AP Human Geography, often referred to as the Griffin-Ford Model, provides a critical framework for understanding the unique urban morphology of cities south of the United States border. Also, developed by geographers Ernst Griffin and Larry Ford in 1980, this model synthesizes the colonial legacy, rapid industrialization, and intense rural-to-urban migration that define the region’s metropolitan landscapes. Unlike the Concentric Zone or Sector models derived from Chicago, the Latin American structure reveals a distinct blend of European planning principles and informal survival strategies, making it a staple concept for the AP exam and a vital lens for analyzing global urbanization patterns.
Historical Foundations: The Law of the Indies
To understand the modern layout, one must first look at the colonial origin point. Worth adding: the Law of the Indies (1573), a comprehensive set of ordinances issued by the Spanish Crown, mandated a standardized grid plan for all new settlements. This decree established the Central Business District (CBD) around a central plaza—typically flanked by a cathedral and government buildings—creating a ceremonial and administrative core. Streets radiated outward in a perfect grid, reinforcing social hierarchy by placing elite residences closest to the center of power.
This rigid orthogonal layout remains the skeleton of almost every major Latin American city today, from Mexico City to Buenos Aires. On the flip side, the contemporary model illustrates how this colonial skeleton has been stretched, distorted, and layered upon by centuries of economic shift and explosive population growth But it adds up..
Deconstructing the Griffin-Ford Model
The model visualizes the city as a series of distinct sectors and zones radiating from the historic center. It highlights a sharp spatial divide between wealth and poverty, often described as a "city of contrasts."
1. The CBD and the Commercial Spine
At the heart lies the traditional CBD, dominated by the historic plaza, cathedrals, and government offices. In the modern era, this area has expanded into a modern commercial sector—often called the "spine"—extending along a grand boulevard (like Paseo de la Reforma in Mexico City or Avenida Paulista in São Paulo). This spine hosts high-rise offices, luxury hotels, upscale shopping malls, and corporate headquarters. It represents the formal economy and the face of globalization.
2. The Elite Residential Sector
Extending outward from the CBD along the commercial spine is the elite residential sector. Wealthy families cluster in this wedge-shaped zone to maintain proximity to the centers of power, commerce, and culture. These neighborhoods feature gated communities, private security, manicured parks, and high-quality infrastructure (water, electricity, sanitation). This sector pushes the city’s boundaries toward the periphery, often leapfrogging over poorer areas to secure the most desirable land—frequently elevated ground with better views and drainage That's the whole idea..
3. The "Matriz" – Middle-Class Residential Zones
Flanking the elite sector and filling in the grid behind the commercial spine lies the middle-class residential zone (sometimes labeled the matriz or matrix). This area conforms more closely to the original colonial grid. Housing here is generally solid, formal construction—apartments, townhouses, and single-family homes—with access to municipal services. It represents the stabilized, formal urban fabric where property titles are clear and infrastructure is reliable The details matter here..
4. The Zone of In Situ Accretion (Zone of Maturity)
Surrounding the middle-class grid is a transitional belt known as the zone of in situ accretion or the zone of maturity. This is a dynamic area where older, formal housing stock is deteriorating or being subdivided. It is characterized by a mix of land uses: small workshops, light industry, and high-density residential conversions. It serves as a buffer between the formal city and the informal periphery. Residents here often have tenure security but face aging infrastructure and overcrowding Not complicated — just consistent..
5. The Zone of Peripheral Squatter Settlements
Perhaps the most defining feature of the model—and the most tested concept in AP Human Geography—is the zone of peripheral squatter settlements. Known locally by various names—favelas (Brazil), barrios (Venezuela/Colombia), villas miseria (Argentina), pueblos jóvenes (Peru), or colonias populares (Mexico)—these areas house the urban poor and recent migrants Took long enough..
- Location: They occupy the least desirable land: steep hillsides prone to landslides, floodplains, swampy lowlands, or the urban fringe far from jobs.
- Morphology: The street pattern is chaotic and organic, ignoring the colonial grid. Roads are narrow, unpaved, and often impassable by vehicles.
- Housing Evolution: The model emphasizes consolidation over time. Structures begin as temporary shacks (ranchos) made of cardboard, tin, and scrap wood. As residents gain tenure security (or at least de facto permanence), they invest in autoconstrucción (self-help housing), upgrading to brick, concrete block, and rebar.
- Services: Initially lacking water, sewer, electricity, and legal title, these neighborhoods slowly acquire services through community organizing and political pressure.
6. The Zone of Disamenity
Distinct from the squatter settlements is the zone of disamenity (or zone of worst housing). These are pockets of extreme poverty within the city fabric—often near industrial zones, rail yards, garbage dumps, or polluted canals. Unlike the peripheral settlements which may consolidate and improve, these areas are often environmental sacrifice zones with hazardous living conditions and minimal hope for formal integration.
The "Mall and Office Park" Evolution: The 1996 Revision
Griffin and Ford updated their model in 1996 to account for neoliberal economic reforms and decentralization. The rise of suburban shopping malls, gated communities (condomínios fechados), and corporate office parks along new ring roads (periféricos) created a secondary CBD or "edge city" phenomenon.
This development pulls the elite sector further outward, creating a dual-city structure: a historic, dense, transit-dependent core and a sprawling, auto-dependent, privatized periphery. This fragmentation exacerbates socio-spatial segregation, as the wealthy effectively "opt out" of the shared urban space, relying on private security, private schools, and private transport.
Comparative Analysis: Latin American vs. North American Models
A frequent AP Human Geography essay prompt requires comparing the Latin American Model with the Concentric Zone Model (Burgess) or the Sector Model (Hoyt) developed for North American cities.
| Feature | North American Models (Burgess/Hoyt) | Latin American Model (Griffin-Ford) |
|---|---|---|
| CBD Character | Single, dominant peak land value intersection. | Dual CBD: Historic colonial core + Modern commercial spine. |
| Elite Location | Outer rings (suburbs/commuter zone). | Inner sector (along the spine, adjacent to CBD). |
| Poor Location | Inner city (Zone of Transition/Decay). | Outer periphery (squatter settlements) + Disamenity zones. Which means |
| Urban Form | Grid often breaks down into curvilinear suburbs. That's why | Strong colonial grid persists in center; organic chaos on periphery. |
| Driving Force | Suburbanization, white flight, automobile ownership. | Rural-to-urban migration, informal economy, lack of affordable housing. |
| Land Tenure | Formal title/deed system dominant. |