Here's a thinking process:
- Analyze User Input:
- User wants a complete article
- Minimum 900 words
- Topic: "who was president at the end of wwii"
- Must follow all the specific instructions provided in the system prompt
- Check Instructions Carefully:
-
Mandatory Instructions:
- Do not write any meta opening sentences like "Okay, here's a comprehensive article", "This article will discuss", "In this article", etc.
- Match language of article with title. Title is in English → article must be entirely in English.
- Start directly with the main content of the article.
- Do not explain that the text is an article or SEO content.
- Do not evaluate or comment on the writing process.
- Output must begin with the first paragraph of the article body, without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions. Wait, it says "without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions" but also says "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword." There's a slight conflict. Let me re-read carefully.
Actually, the prompt says: "- The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword." "- Start directly with the main content of the article." "- Do not explain that the text is an article or SEO content." "- Do not add greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions."
Hmm, "without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions" seems to conflict with "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword." But I think the intent is: start directly with content, no "Okay, here's an article about..." type openings. The opening paragraph is the introduction, but it shouldn't be framed as "In this article we will discuss...". It should just naturally start with the topic. I'll treat it as: write the first paragraph introducing the topic naturally, without labeling it as an intro or meta description. I'll make sure the first paragraph contains the main keyword and introduces the topic, but without saying "This article discusses..." or similar Turns out it matters..
-
Language: Title is English → article in English.
-
Structure: Clear subheadings for Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, Conclusion. Wait, this is about a historical/political topic, not a "scientific experiment". But the structure says "such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion." I need to adapt: for a history article, I'll use relevant subheadings. Maybe "Introduction", "Historical Context", "The Transition of Power", "FAQ", "Conclusion". I should follow the spirit: use clear subheadings for important sections. I'll use H2/H3 markdown. I'll likely have subheadings like "Introduction", "The Final Days of the War", "Harry S. Truman: The President Who Saw Victory", "Frequently Asked Questions", "Conclusion". I'll avoid "Steps" and "Scientific Explanation" if they don't fit, but the prompt says "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion." It might be a template. I'll interpret "Steps" as maybe "Key Events" or similar, but I'll keep it natural. Actually, I can have subheadings: Introduction, The End of WWII and Presidential Transition, Harry S. Truman's Presidency, Frequently Asked Questions, Conclusion. I'll make sure to use H2 and H3 markdown It's one of those things that adds up..
-
Formatting: Use bold for important points, italic for foreign terms or light emphasis. Use lists for sequences or important sets of information.
-
SEO: Use main keyword and semantic keywords naturally. Avoid keyword stuffing. No external links. Original, informative.
-
Word count: At least 900 words Easy to understand, harder to ignore..
-
No meta openings: No "Okay, here's a comprehensive article...", no "This article will discuss...", no "In this article..." It's one of those things that adds up..
-
Start directly with main content.
Let's plan the article structure mentally:
- First paragraph: introduces the topic, contains main keyword "who was president at the end of wwii" naturally. In practice, no "In this article" phrasing. - Then maybe a subheading "Introduction" or just continue naturally. That's why actually, the prompt says "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion. " I'll use subheadings. I'll start with the first paragraph, then have H2 subheadings.
- I need to ensure exactly or at least 900 words. I'll aim for ~1000-1100 to be safe.
- Main keyword: "who was president at the end of wwii" or variations. I'll use it naturally.
- Semantic keywords/LSI: "Harry S. Truman", "World War II", "1945", "V-J Day", "presidential succession", "Allied Powers", "Japan's surrender", "Truman Doctrine" maybe, but keep it relevant.
Let's outline:
- Practically speaking, first paragraph (no heading? But or with heading? In real terms, the prompt says "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction... ". I think I should have an Introduction section. But also "Start directly with the main content of the article." and "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword." I'll make the first paragraph the introduction, without a heading above it, or I can have "Introduction" as the first H2, but then the first paragraph wouldn't be the opening. I'll interpret: the very first line of output should be the start of the article content. I can have a heading "Introduction" after that, or I can make the first paragraph itself under no heading, then "Introduction" as H2. Also, to be safe, I'll start with the first paragraph directly, then have "Introduction" as an H2, but that might duplicate. Consider this: actually, many articles have the first paragraph as an intro, then maybe a heading later. I'll just start with content, and use subheadings for subsequent sections. The prompt says "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion." I'll include those as H2s. I'll make the first paragraph the intro content, then maybe an "Introduction" H2 that summarizes? Consider this: that's redundant. I'll do this: start with the first paragraph introducing the topic. Then have H2 "The Final Days of the War in Europe and the Pacific". Practically speaking, then H2 "Harry S. Plus, truman: The Man Who Ended WWII". Which means then H2 "Frequently Asked Questions". Worth adding: then H2 "Conclusion". I'll avoid "Steps" and "Scientific Explanation" as they don't fit, but I can adapt "Steps" to "Key Milestones" or similar. In real terms, actually, I'll just use relevant headings. The prompt says "such as", meaning those are examples. I'll use headings that make sense.
Let's re-read carefully: "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion." I think I should include sections that roughly match these, or at least have headings. Day to day, i'll create: Introduction, The End of the War, Truman's Presidency, FAQ, Conclusion. That covers it Easy to understand, harder to ignore..
It sounds simple, but the gap is usually here.
- No links.
- No evaluating writing process.
- Output must begin with first paragraph of article body, without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions. Wait, "without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions" - but also "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword." This is tricky. I think the intent is: don't write "Hello readers, in this article we will...". Just start with the topic. The first paragraph is the introduction, but it should be written naturally, not labeled as a meta description. I'll write a paragraph that introduces the topic and includes the main keyword, without saying "This paragraph introduces...". I'll just start with something like "When the guns fell silent in 1945, a new chapter in global leadership began..." That